| Goldman v Rose Castle Redevelopment II, LLC |
| Motion No: 2021-07924 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2023 NY Slip Op 65525(U) |
| Decided on April 21, 2023 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M288607
ID/
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, J.P.
ROBERT J. MILLER
WILLIAM G. FORD
DEBORAH A. DOWLING, JJ.
|
2021-07924 Yoel Goldman, appellant-respondent, v Rose Castle Redevelopment II, LLC, et al., respondents-appellants, Fedor Itskovitch, et al., respondents. (Index No. 510224/2021)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 30, 2021. Motion by the respondents-appellants to extend the time to serve and file an answering brief.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted, and on or before May 22, 2023, the respondents-appellants shall serve and file their answering brief, including the points of argument on the cross appeal (see 22 NYCRR 1250.9[f][1][iv]), via NYSCEF, if applicable, or if NYSCEF is not mandated, serve the answering brief and upload a digital copy of the answering brief, with proof of service thereof, through the digital portal on this Court's website.
BRATHWAITE NELSON, J.P., MILLER, FORD and DOWLING, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Maria T. Fasulo
Clerk of the Court