| Matter of Thompson v Annucci |
| Motion No: 2022-03694 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2023 NY Slip Op 70647(U) |
| Decided on July 24, 2023 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M290182
AFA/
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
BETSY BARROS
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
HELEN VOUTSINAS, JJ.
|
2022-03694 In the Matter of Paul Thompson, appellant, v Anthony Annucci, etc., respondent. (Index No. 218/2021)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated October 8, 2021, which was deemed dismissed pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1250.10(a). Motion by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1250.10(c) to vacate the dismissal of the appeal, to extend the time to perfect the appeal, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel,
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to vacate the dismissal of the appeal is granted, the dismissal of the appeal pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1250.10(a) is vacated; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branches of the motion which are for leave to prosecute the appeal on the original papers and to extend the time to perfect the appeal are granted and the appellant's time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 1250.9[a][5]), and by serving and filing the appellant's brief via NYSCEF, if applicable, or, if NYSCEF is not mandated, by serving the appellant's brief, and uploading a digital copy of the appellant's brief, with proof of service thereof, through the digital portal on this Court's website, is extended until August 23, 2023; if the appellant is unable to access the digital portal on this Court's website, the appellant may file one copy of the brief by regular mail; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branches of the motion which are to waive payment of the filing fee, for free transcripts, and for the assignment of counsel are denied.
DILLON, J.P., BARROS, CHAMBERS and VOUTSINAS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Maria T. Fasulo
Clerk of the Court