Matter of East End Hangars, Inc. v Town of East Hampton, New York

Matter of East End Hangars, Inc. v Town of East Hampton, New York

Motion No: 2022-09552

Slip Opinion No: 2023 NY Slip Op 72009(U)

Decided on August 18, 2023

Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports.

Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M290593

AFA/

FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, J.P.

JOSEPH J. MALTESE

JANICE A. TAYLOR

LOURDES M. VENTURA, JJ.

2022-09552
In the Matter of East End Hangars, Inc., et al.,
respondents, v Town of East Hampton, New
York, appellant.
(Proceeding No. 1)
In the Matter of The Coalition to Keep East
Hampton Airport Open Ltd., et al., respondents,
v Town of East Hampton, New York, appellant.
(Proceeding No. 2)
In the Matter of Blade Air Mobility, Inc., et al.,
respondents, v Town of East Hampton, New York,
et al., appellants.
(Proceeding No. 3)
(Index Nos. 602799/2022, 602801/2022, 602802/202

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

2)

2023-05193

In the Matter of East End Hangars, Inc., et al.,

respondents, v Town of East Hampton, New

York, appellant.

(Proceeding No. 1)

In the Matter of The Coalition to Keep East

Hampton Airport Open Ltd., et al., respondents,

v Town of East Hampton, New York, appellant.

(Proceeding No. 2)

In the Matter of Blade Air Mobility, Inc., et al.,

respondents, v Town of East Hampton, New York,

et al., appellants.

(Proceeding No. 3)

(Index Nos. 602799/2022, 602801/2022, 602802/2022)

Appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated October 19, 2022, and an order of the same court dated May 19, 2023. Motion by the appellants to stay enforcement of stated portions of the order, pending hearing and determination of that appeals, to consolidate the appeals, and for a preference in the calendaring of the appeals.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for a preference in the calendaring of the appeals is granted, and the appeals will be calendared expeditiously after all briefs have been filed; and it is further,

ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied; and it is further,

ORDERED that on the Court's own motion, the appeals will be calendared together and will be argued or submitted on the same date

CONNOLLY, J.P., MALTESE, TAYLOR and VENTURA, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Acting Clerk of the Court