People v Brown, Quesan
Motion No: 2022-01663
Slip Opinion No: 2024 NY Slip Op 67050(U)
Decided on May 1, 2024
Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports.


Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M296127

KS/afa

HECTOR D. LASALLE, P.J.

MARK C. DILLON

COLLEEN D. DUFFY

BETSY BARROS

FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.

2022-01663, 2022-05456

The People, etc., respondent,

v Quesan Brown, appellant.

(Ind. No. 202/2021)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

By decision and order on motion of this Court dated November 28, 2022, issued in compliance with the requirements of People v Garcia (93 NY2d 42), the People were directed to serve a copy of the decision and order on motion dated November 28, 2022, together with copies of their brief and the transcripts of the proceedings, upon the defendant, Quesan Brown, by personal delivery of the same to him and file proof of such service with the Clerk of this Court within 20 days. The People did not serve a copy of the decision and order on motion dated November 28, 2022.

The People having appealed from two orders of the County Court, Rockland County, dated February 8, 2022, and May 6, 2022, respectively, and the appeals having been perfected on August 3, 2022, and the defendant, Quesan Brown, having failed to timely file a brief in response thereto.

Now, in compliance with the requirements of People v Garcia (93 NY2d 42):

QUESAN BROWN IS HEREBY ADVISED

A. that he has the right to the assistance of counsel on the People's appeals;

B. that if he is financially unable to retain counsel he may make an application to this Court for the assignment of counsel, and, upon proof of such financial inability, one will be appointed for him;

C. that he has the right to forego the assistance of counsel and to respond to the People's appeals pro se; and

D. that unless within 60 days from the date of service of this decision and order on motion the defendant, Quesan Brown, either responds to the appeals pro se or by retained counsel, or moves for the appointment of counsel to represent him, he shall be deemed to have waived his right to counsel on the appeals and they shall be heard and determined on the People's brief alone.

On the Court's own motion, it is

ORDERED that the People are directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion, together with copies of their brief and the transcripts of the proceedings, upon the defendant, Quesan Brown, by personal delivery of the same to him; and it is further,

ORDERED that the People shall file proof of such service with the Clerk of this Court within 20 days of the date hereof, via email at [email protected]; and it is further,

ORDERED that the time of the defendant, Quesan Brown, to respond to the appeals pro se or by retained counsel, or to move for the assignment of counsel, is extended until 60 days after the date of service upon him of a copy of this decision and order on motion together with copies of the People's brief and the transcripts of the proceedings, and in the event that he fails to so respond to the appeals, or to move for the assignment of counsel within that time, or fails to move for an enlargement of time to respond to the appeals, the defendant, Quesan Brown, shall be deemed to have waived his right to counsel, and the appeals shall be considered and determined only on the People's brief and the original record; and it is further,

ORDERED that if personal service of a copy of this decision and order on motion cannot be made with due diligence, the People may make an application ex parte to this Court for an order authorizing alternative methods of service. Such an application shall be supported by affidavit or affidavits detailing the steps taken to find and serve the defendant, Quesan Brown, personally.

LASALLE, P.J., DILLON, DUFFY, BARROS and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court