Jackson v A M E Zion-Trinity Housing Development Fund Company, Inc
Motion No: 2022-09063
Slip Opinion No: 2024 NY Slip Op 73177(U)
Decided on August 23, 2024
Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports.


Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M298721

AFA/

FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, J.P.

LINDA CHRISTOPHER

BARRY E. WARHIT

HELEN VOUTSINAS, JJ.

2022-09063

Jesse Jackson, appellant, v A M E Zion-Trinity

Housing Development Fund Company, Inc.,

et al., respondents.

(Index No. 51297/2020)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

2023-12318

Jesse Jackson, appellant, v A M E Zion-Trinity

Housing Development Fund Company, Inc.,

et al., respondents.

(Index No. 51297/2020)

Appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated September 8, 2022, and a judgment of the same court dated December 12, 2023. The appeal from the order was deemed dismissed pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1250.10(a). Motion by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1250.10(c) to vacate the dismissal of the appeal from the order, to extend the time to perfect the appeals, and to consolidate the appeals.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the branches of the motion which are to vacate the dismissal of the appeal from the order and to extend the time to perfect the appeals are granted, the dismissal of the appeal from the order pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1250.10(a) is vacated, and on or before October 22, 2024, the appellant shall serve and file the record or appendix and the appellant's brief via NYSCEF, if applicable, or, if NYSCEF is not mandated, serve the record or appendix and the appellant's brief and upload digital copies of the record or appendix and the appellant's brief, with proof of service thereof, through the digital portal on this Court's website; and it is further,

ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to consolidate the appeals is denied as unnecessary as the appeals may be consolidated as of right (see 22 NYCRR 1250.9[f][3]).

CONNOLLY, J.P., CHRISTOPHER, WARHIT and VOUTSINAS, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court