Evans v Evans
Motion No: 2024-02418
Slip Opinion No: 2025 NY Slip Op 61735(U)
Decided on January 31, 2025
Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports.


Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M302505

AFA/

BETSY BARROS, J.P.

WILLIAM G. FORD

LILLIAN WAN

LAURENCE L. LOVE, JJ.

2024-02418

Eli Evans, appellant,

v Sivan Evans, respondent.

(Index No. 550668/2020)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

2024-05627

In the Matter of Eli A. Evans, appellant,

v Sivan Evans, respondent.

(Docket No. 550668/2020)

Appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Kings County, both dated May 11, 2023. Renewed motion by the appellant pro se for waiver of costs, fees, and expenses and for the assignment of counsel on the appeal from the order under Appellate Division Docket No. 2024-02418. Separate motion by the appellant pro se to consolidate the appeals and for waiver of costs, fees, and expenses and the assignment of counsel on the appeal from the order under Appellate Division Docket No. 2024-05627.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motions and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion and the branch of the motion which are for waiver of costs, fees, and expenses and the assignment of counsel are denied, with leave to renew within 30 days of the date of this decision and order on motion, upon proper papers, including the appellant's affidavit setting forth (1) the appellant's full financial situation including all assets, both real and personal, as well as any and all sources of income, (2) whether the appellant was represented by assigned counsel or retained counsel in the Supreme Court and, if retained, the amount and source of counsel fees paid to retained counsel, and (3) the amount and source of money used to pay for hearing transcripts; and it is further,

ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to consolidate the appeals is denied as unnecessary as the appeals may be consolidated as of right (see 22 NYCRR 1250.9[f][3]).

BARROS, J.P., FORD, WAN and LOVE, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court