| Agudas Chasidei Chabad of United States v Congregation Lubavitch, Inc. ("CLI"), Zalman Lipskier, Avrohom Holtzberg & Nachum Kaplinsky |
| Motion No: 2024-01072 KC |
| Slip Opinion No: 2025 NY Slip Op 64801(U) |
| Decided on March 12, 2025 |
| Appellate Term, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
of the State of New York for the 2nd, 11th & 13th Judicial Districts
WAVNY TOUSSAINT, P.J.
CHEREÉ A. BUGGS
MARINA CORA MUNDY, JJ.
DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION
| Agudas Chasidei Chabad of the United States, Respondent, v Congregation Lubavitch, Inc. ("CLI"), Zalman Lipskier, Avrohom Holtzberg and Nachum Kaplinsky, Appellants and Yosef Losh, Individually and in his capacity as Trustee of CLI, Occupant. Occupant and Menachem Gerlitzky, Individually and in his capacity as Gabbai, in the capacity as trustee of CLI, Occupant. |
Merkos L'Inyonei Chinuch and Merkos L. Chinuch, Respondents, v Congregation Lubavitch, Inc. ("CLI"), Zalman Lipskier, Avrohom Holtzberg and Nachum Kaplinsky, Appellants, Yosef Losh and Menachem Gerlitzky, Occupants.
Appellate Term Docket No.
2024-1073 K C
Lower Court # 106106/11
---------------------------------------------------------------------x
Merkos L'Inyonei Chinuch and Merkos L. Chinuch,
Respondents, v Congregation Lubavitch, Inc. ("CLI"), Appellate Term Docket No.
Zalman Lipskier, Avrohom Holtzberg and Nachum Kaplinsky, 2024-1074 K C
Appellants, Yosef Losh and Menachem Gerlitzky, Occupants.
Lower Court # 106107/11
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------x
Motions by appellants on appeals from orders of the Civil Court, Kings County, each dated October 10, 2024, to stay the orders pending the determination of the respective appeals.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motions and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED, on the court's own motion, that the appeals and motions are consolidated for purposes of disposition of the motions; and it is further,
ORDERED that the motions are granted (see Rivera v Glen Oaks Vil. Owners, Inc., 29 AD3d 560 [2006]).
ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk