| Rutty v SLF New York Holdings, LLC |
| Motion No: 2024-01764 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2025 NY Slip Op 64993(U) |
| Decided on March 19, 2025 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M303671
AFA/
LARA J. GENOVESI, J.P.
DEBORAH A. DOWLING
JANICE A. TAYLOR
PHILLIP HOM, JJ.
|
2024-01764 Robert R. Rutty, appellant, v SLF New York Holdings, LLC, et al., defendants, Margolin & Weinreb Law Group, LLP, respondent. (Index No. 705533/2022)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated November 14, 2023. Motion by the respondent to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the appendix is inadequate or, in the alternative, to extend the time to serve and file a respondent's brief.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to dismiss the appeal is denied; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to extend the time to serve and file a brief is granted, and on or before April 18, 2025, the respondent shall serve and file the respondent's brief via NYSCEF, if applicable, or, if NYSCEF is not mandated, serve the brief and upload a digital copy of the brief, with proof of service thereof, through the digital portal on this Court's website.
GENOVESI, J.P., DOWLING, TAYLOR and HOM, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Darrell M. Joseph
Clerk of the Court