| Melendez-Arenas v Sisters of Saint Joseph |
| Motion No: 2023-12512 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2025 NY Slip Op 71244(U) |
| Decided on June 20, 2025 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M305747
AFA/
BETSY BARROS, J.P.
WILLIAM G. FORD
LOURDES M. VENTURA
DONNA-MARIE E. GOLIA, JJ.
|
2023-12512 Jose Melendez-Arenas, plaintiff-respondent- appellant, v Sisters of Saint Joseph, defendant- appellant-respondent, et al., defendants, DPC New York, Inc., defendant third-party plaintiff- respondent-appellant; United Restoration & Development Corp., third-party defendant- appellant-respondent, et al., third-party defendant. (Index No. 717602/2017)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Appeals and cross-appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated December 12, 2023. Motion by United Restoration & Development Corp., to extend the time to perfect its appeal and, in effect, to enlarge the joint record on appeal. Motion by Jose Melendez-Arenas to extend the time to serve and file an answering brief.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motions and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the branch of the motion by United Restoration & Development Corp., which is to extend the time to perfect its appeal is granted, and on or before July 21, 2025, United Restoration & Development Corp., shall serve and file its brief via NYSCEF, if applicable, or, if NYSCEF is not mandated, serve its brief and upload digital copies of the brief, with proof of service thereof, through the digital portal on this Court's website; and it is further
ORDERED that the branch of the motion by United Restoration & Development Corp. which is, in effect, to enlarge the joint record on appeal is denied; and it is further,
ORDERED that the motion by Jose Melendez-Arenas to extend the time to serve and file an answering brief is denied as premature.
BARROS, J.P., FORD, VENTURA and GOLIA, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Darrell M. Joseph
Clerk of the Court