Singh v Skanska USA Civil Northeast Inc.
Motion No: 2024-10278
Slip Opinion No: 2025 NY Slip Op 73537(U)
Decided on July 28, 2025
Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports.


Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M306836

ID/

CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, J.P.

LINDA CHRISTOPHER

CARL J. LANDICINO

PHILLIP HOM, JJ.

2024-10278

Naginder Singh, plaintiff-respondent, v

Skanska USA Civil Northeast Inc., et al.,

defendants third-party plaintiffs respondents-

appellants; ASR Electrical Contracting, Inc.,

third-party defendant appellant-respondent;

Farley Building Master Tenant LLC, nonparty-

respondent.

(Index No. 708953/2021)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Appeal and cross-appeal from an amended order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated July 11, 2024. The appeal was deemed dismissed pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1250.10(a). Motion by the appellant-respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1250.10(c) to vacate the dismissal of the appeal and, in effect, to extend the time to perfect the appeal. Motion by the respondents-appellants to extend the time to perfect the cross-appeal.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion by the appellant-respondent and the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of the motion by the respondents-appellants and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion by the appellant-respondent is granted, the dismissal of the appeal pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1250.10(a) is vacated, and on or before August 27, 2025, the appellant-respondent shall and serve and file the joint record or appendix and the appellant-respondent's brief via NYSCEF, if applicable, or, if NYSCEF is not mandated, serve the joint record or appendix and the appellant-respondent's brief and upload digital copies of the joint record or appendix and the appellant-respondent's brief, with proof of service thereof, through the digital portal on this Court's website; and it is further,

ORDERED that the motion by the respondents-appellants is denied as premature.

CHAMBERS, J.P., CHRISTOPHER, LANDICINO and HOM, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court