Matter of Dove Transport Service, LP v New York State Department of He
Motion No: 2024-11733
Slip Opinion No: 2025 NY Slip Op 73955(U)
Decided on August 6, 2025
Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports.


Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M307009

AFA/

COLLEEN D. DUFFY, J.P.

ROBERT J. MILLER

LINDA CHRISTOPHER

JAMES P. MCCORMACK, JJ.

2024-11733

In the Matter of Dove Transport Service, LP,

et al., appellants, v New York State Department

of Health, et al., respondents.

(Index No. 707573/2024)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated September 24, 2024. Motion by the appellants Jean R. Daniel and Mohammed Raushan, inter alia, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1250.7(g) to waive certification of the record, to extend the time to perfect the appeal, and for leave to prosecute the appeal pro se.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1250.7(g) to waive certification of the record is denied, with leave to renew, on or before September 56 2025, upon proper papers, and upon a showing of good cause for the waiver of certification, which shall include setting forth an inability to certify by any of the methods set forth in 22 NYCRR 1250.7(g); and it is further,

ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to extend the time to perfect the appeal is granted, and on or before October 5, 2025, the appellants shall serve and file the record or appendix and the appellants' brief via NYSCEF, if applicable, or, if NYSCEF is not mandated, serve the record or appendix and the appellants' brief and upload digital copies of the record or appendix and the appellants' brief, with proof of service thereof, through the digital portal on this Court's website; and it is further,

ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to prosecute the appeal pro se is denied without prejudice to filing of a consent to change attorney (see 22 NYCRR 670.1[c][4][A]); and it is further,

ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied.

DUFFY, J.P., MILLER, CHRISTOPHER and MCCORMACK, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court