Deutsche Bank v Brown
Motion No: 2023-06741
Slip Opinion No: 2025 NY Slip Op 78998(U)
Decided on October 22, 2025
Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports.


Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M308748

AFA/

FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, J.P.

CHERYL E. CHAMBERS

HELEN VOUTSINAS

ELENA GOLDBERG VELAZQUEZ, JJ.

2023-06741

Deutsche Bank, respondent,

v Ladwan Brown, et al., defendants;

10224 Avenue K LLC, nonparty-appellant.

(Index No. 509512/2014)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 17, 2023. Motion by the respondent to dismiss the appeal, in effect, on the ground that no appeal lies as of right from an order holding a motion in abeyance and leave to appeal has not been granted. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated March 27, 2024, the motion to dismiss the appeal, in effect, on the ground that no appeal lies as of right from an order holding a motion in abeyance was held in abeyance and referred to the panel of Justices hearing the appeal for determination upon the argument or submission thereof. Separate motion by the respondent to dismiss the appeal on the ground that it has been rendered academic.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion to dismiss the appeal, in effect, on the ground that no appeal lies as of right from an order holding a motion in abeyance and the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of the motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that it has been rendered academic and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that it has been rendered academic is granted, and the appeal is dismissed, without costs and disbursements; and it is further,

ORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal, in effect, on the ground that no appeal lies as of right from an order holding a motion in abeyance is denied as academic.

CONNOLLY, J.P., CHAMBERS, VOUTSINAS and GOLDBERG VELAZQUEZ, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court