| Wenegieme v JP Morgan Chase |
| Motion No: 2024-06823 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2025 NY Slip Op 79048(U) |
| Decided on October 22, 2025 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M308755
AFA/
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, J.P.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
HELEN VOUTSINAS
ELENA GOLDBERG VELAZQUEZ, JJ.
|
2024-06823 Celeste Wenegieme, appellant, v JP Morgan Chase, et al., respondents. (Index No. 626219/2023)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated March 4, 2024. Motion by the respondents to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the record is inadequate or, in the alternative, to direct the appellant to serve and file a supplemental record containing certain material, and to extend the time to serve and file a brief. By order to show cause dated August 22, 2025, the parties were directed to show cause before this Court why the appeal should or should not be dismissed on the ground that no appeal lies from an order entered upon the default of the appealing party and the motion by the respondents was held in abeyance in the interim.
Now, upon the order to show cause and the papers filed in response thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of the motion by the respondents and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that no appeal lies frm an order entered on the default of the appealing party is granted and the appeal is dismissed (see CPLR 5511), without costs or disbursements; and it is further,
ORDERED that the motion by the respondents is denied as academic.
CONNOLLY, J.P., CHAMBERS, VOUTSINAS and HOM, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Darrell M. Joseph
Clerk of the Court