| DAS Realty & Mgt., Inc., Petitioner-Respondent v Vanessa Thill & J Doe |
| Motion No: 2023-01198 KC |
| Slip Opinion No: 2025 NY Slip Op 81190(U) |
| Decided on November 12, 2025 |
| Appellate Term, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
of the State of New York for the 2nd, 11th & 13th Judicial Districts
WAVNY TOUSSAINT
MARINA CORA MUNDY
JOANNE D. QUIÑONES, JJ.
DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION
| DAS Realty & Management, Inc., Petitioner-Respondent, v Vanessa Thill and J Doe, Respondents-Respondents, Benjamin Hayes Spaundar, Respondent-Appellant, "John Doe" and "Jane Doe", Undertenants. |
Motion by appellant on an appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County, dated September 21, 2023, for an order directing the Civil Court to recite the papers considered in determining the motion, and for an extension of time to perfect the appeal. Cross-motion by petitioner-respondent to dismiss the appeal, or, in the alternative, for an order directing appellant to post an undertaking.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motions and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the branch of the motion seeking an order directing the Civil Court to recite the papers considered on the motion, as required by CPLR 2210 (a) and Matter of Dondi, 63 NY2d 331,339 (1984), is granted and the Civil Court is directed to recite the papers considered on the motion forthwith; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion seeking an extension of time to perfect the appeal is granted, and the appeal shall be perfected on or before February 10, 2026; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the appeal is not perfected by February 10, 2026, the court, on its own motion, may dismiss the appeal, or respondent may move, on three days' notice, to dismiss the appeal, and may, if appellant is unrepresented, serve such motion upon appellant in person; and it is further,
ORDERED that the cross motion is denied.
ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk