| Matter of S. (Anonymous), Tristan; S. (Anonymous), Kristen; Administra |
| Motion No: 2026-02265 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2026 NY Slip Op 65038(U) |
| Decided on March 27, 2026 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M312252
DF/
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, J.P.
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON
BARRY E. WARHIT
JAMES P. MCCORMACK, JJ.
|
2026-02265 In the Matter of Tristan S. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, petitioner-appellant; Jewanlal S. (Anonymous), respondent-respondent. (Proceeding No. 1) In the Matter of Kristen S. (Anonymous), nonparty-appellant. Administration for Children's Services, petitioner-appellant; Jewanlal S. (Anonymous), respondent-respondent. (Proceeding No. 2) (Docket Nos. NN-929-2026, NN-928-2026)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated March 2, 2026. Motion by the nonparty-appellant, inter alia, in effect, to stay enforcement of the order, pending hearing and determination of the appeals. Motion by the petitioner-appellant, inter alia, to stay enforcement of the order, to continue the remand of the subject children to the care and custody of the petitioner-appellant, and to direct that the respondent have agency-supervised visitation with the subject children, pending hearing and determination of the appeals.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motions and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that on the Court's own motion the notices of appeal from the order are deemed to be notices of appeal from a corrected order of the same court, dated March 2, 2026 (see CPLR 5512[a]); and it is further,
ORDERED that the motions are granted to the extent that enforcement of so much of the corrected order as released the subject children to the care of the respondent is stayed, the remand of the subject children to the care and custody of the petitioner-appellant is continued, and the respondent shall have agency-supervised visitation with the subject children, pending hearing and determination of the appeals, and the motions are otherwise denied.
CONNOLLY, J.P., BRATHWAITE NELSON, WARHIT and MCCORMACK, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Darrell M. Joseph
Clerk of the Court