APPELLATE TERM : 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
| THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, ROEDER'S ARK, HUMANE SOCIETY OF MIDDLETOWN, INC. and WARWICK VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY, INC., Respondents, -against- JACK STOLTZ and FRANCES C. STOLTZ, Appellants. |
DECISION
On the court's own motion, motions by defendants-appellants returnable February 3, 2005 seeking, in essence, inter alia, to vacate dismissal of appeal are hereby consolidated for purposes of disposition.
That branch of the motion seeking, in essence, to vacate dismissal of the appeal is granted on condition that the appeal is perfected by June 3, 2005; otherwise, motion denied.
That branch of the motion seeking, in essence, discovery is denied.
That branch of the motion seeking, in essence, to reinstate stay contained in order dated October 21, 2004 pending determination of appeal is granted.
APPELLATE TERM : 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
| THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, ROEDER'S ARK, HUMANE SOCIETY OF MIDDLETOWN, INC. and WARWICK VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY, INC., Respondents, -against- JACK STOLTZ and FRANCES C. STOLTZ, Appellants. |
DECISION
On the court's own motion, motions by defendants-appellants returnable February 3, 2005 seeking, in essence, inter alia, to vacate dismissal of appeal are hereby consolidated for purposes of disposition.
That branch of the motion seeking, in essence, to vacate dismissal of the appeal is granted on condition that the appeal is perfected by June 3, 2005; otherwise, motion denied.
That branch of the motion seeking, in essence, discovery is denied.
That branch of the motion seeking, in essence, to reinstate stay contained in order dated October 21, 2004 pending determination of appeal is granted.