APPELLATE TERM : 2nd and 11th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
| CHI-AM REALTY, INC., Respondent, -against- ROBERT GUDDAHL and TERRI GUDDAHL, Appellants. |
DECISION
That branch of the motion by tenants-appellants for leave to appeal to the Appellate Division granted.
That branch of the motion seeking reargument and incidental relief denied.
Patterson, J., taking no part.
Presiding Justice, Appellate Term
Associate Justice, Appellate Term
APPELLATE TERM : 2nd and 11th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
| NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY HAMMEL HOUSES, Appellant, -against- ELLAMAE NEWMAN, Respondent. |
DECISION
Motion by landlord-appellant for leave to appeal to the Appellate Division denied.
Aronin, J., taking no part.
APPELLATE TERM: 2nd and 11th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
| THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, -against- ALLEN BRASWELL, Appellant. |
DECISION
Motion by defendant-appellant for poor person relief and assignment of counsel is denied without prejudice to renewal upon furnishing this court with proper papers.
Defendant has failed to furnish this court with the basic financial information necessary to determine whether he is indigent, including a completed application for poor person relief.
APPELLATE TERM : 2nd and 11th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
| THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, -against- TED S. JOYNER, Appellant. |
DECISION
Motion by defendant appellant for leave to appeal is denied.
No appeal lies from an order arising out of a criminal proceeding absent specific statutory authorization (see CPL 450.10; People v Santos, 64 NY2d 702, 704 [1984]; People v Herrara, 171 AD2d 85, 87 [1991]).
APPELLATE TERM : 2nd and 11th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
| THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, -against- WILLIAM O'CONNOR, Appellant. |
DECISION
Motion by defendant-appellant for poor person relief and assignment of counsel is denied without prejudice to renewal upon furnishing this court with proper papers.
Defendant has failed to furnish this court with the financial information necessary to determine whether he is indigent. In his application for poor person relief, defendant has failed to answer several items, including whether his fiance/wife is employed and her income, the amount deposited in his bank accounts and his current salary.