SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

APPELLATE TERM : 2nd and 11th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

PRESENT: GOLIA, J.P., RIOS and BELEN, JJ.

NO. 2004-327 K C
3405 NEWKIRK CORP.,

Respondent,

-against-

ANN LAFLEUR,

Appellant,

"JOHN DOE" & "JANE DOE",

Undertenants.

DECISION

That branch of motion by appellant seeking, in essence, to reinstate appeal and enlarge time to perfect appeal granted, on condition that appeal be perfected on or before October 7, 2005; otherwise, denied.

That branch of motion seeking to continue stay pending determination of appeal granted on condition that tenant continue to pay use and occupancy as same becomes due and properly perfect the appeal by October 7, 2005; otherwise, denied.





SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

APPELLATE TERM : 2nd and 11th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

PRESENT: GOLIA, J.P., RIOS and BELEN, JJ.

NO. 2004-688 K C
479 PROSPECT PLACE REALTY CORP.,

Respondent,

-against-


ROSALIE McLAUGHLIN,

Appellant.

DECISION

Motion by tenant-appellant to reinstate and continue the stay contained in the order of August 9, 2004 and subsequently extended is granted on condition that tenant perfects the appeal by October 7, 2005; otherwise stay is vacated without further order of this court. Tenant shall continue to comply with all the other conditions contained in the prior orders of this court.





SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

APPELLATE TERM : 2nd and 11th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

PRESENT: PESCE, P.J., PATTERSON and BELEN, JJ.

NO. 2005-320 Q C
LILIER ANDREA CHAMORROFUENTES
AND JOAO MARCEDO,

Appellants,

-against-


EVELENA GOODMAN; TONY GOODMAN,

Respondents.

DECISION

Motion by plaintiffs-appellants for an enlargement of time to perfect appeal is granted and appeal shall be perfected by September 2, 2005; otherwise appeal dismissed.





SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

APPELLATE TERM 9th & 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

PRESENT : RUDOLPH, P.J., McCABE and TANENBAUM, JJ.

NO.2005-658 RO C
JAMES T. CORN,

Appellant,

-against-

PHIL MURPHY,

Respondent.

DECISION

On the court's own motion, appeal dismissed.

The appeal is dismissed since no appeal lies by a defaulting party from a default judgment.

Appellant, if he be so advised, may move to vacate the default in the court below, and if necessary, take an appeal from an order resulting in an adverse determination.



SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

APPELLATE TERM : 2nd and 11th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

PRESENT : GOLIA, J.P., RIOS and BELEN, JJ.

NO.2005-880 Q C
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING PRESERVATION AND
DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK,

Respondent,

-against-

STEVEN GREEN,

Appellant.

DECISION

Motion by appellant for a stay pending determination of the appeal is granted.

Appellant has perfected the appeal.

It is noted that opposition papers were considered.

Rios, J., taking no part.