SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

APPELLATE TERM : 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS


PRESENT: McCABE, P.J., RUDOLPH and ANGIOLILLO, JJ.


NO. 2002-549 W C
RICHARD DAKIN,

Respondent,

-against-


ROBERT DISTASIO,

Appellant.

DECISION

Motion by appellant to enlarge the time to perfect his appeal granted on condition that the appeal is perfected by November 5, 2004; otherwise, motion denied.




SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

APPELLATE TERM : 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS


PRESENT: McCABE, P.J., RUDOLPH and ANGIOLILLO, JJ.


NO. 2003-1563 S C
RONALD WILENSKY, D.D.S.,

Respondent,

-against-


EMILY FELDMAN,

Appellant.

DECISION

Motion by plaintiff-respondent for leave to appeal to the Appellate Division denied.




SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

APPELLATE TERM: 2nd and 11th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS


PRESENT : PESCE, P.J., GOLIA and RIOS, JJ.


NO. 2004-68 K C
THE 1935 CORP.,

Respondent,

-against-


GEORGETTE FLOWERS,

Appellant.

DECISION

Motion by petitioner-respondent to vacate the stay contained in the order of this court dated April 16, 2004 and continued by the order of this court dated July 28, 2004 granted.






SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

APPELLATE TERM : 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS


PRESENT: McCABE, P.J., RUDOLPH and ANGIOLILLO, JJ.


NO. 2004-80 N C
RICHARD SOLOMONIC,
RICH SOLOMONIC CARPENTRY,

Respondent,

-against-

ALFREDO VILLANUEVA,

Appellant.

DECISION

Motion by defendant-appellant to vacate this court's order dated May 18, 2004, which dismissed his appeal denied without prejudice to renewal upon proper papers.

Absent from the motion papers is any affidavit of service.




SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

APPELLATE TERM : 2nd and 11th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS


PRESENT : PESCE, P.J., GOLIA and RIOS, JJ.


NO.2004-1033 K C
DIDIMO OREJUELA,

Respondent,

-against-

ANTHONY KOLODZIEJCZYK,

Appellant,

-and-

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING PRESERVATION AND
DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK,

Co-Respondents.

DECISION

On the court's own motion, appeal is dismissed.

No appeal lies by a defaulting party from an order entered on default. It further appears that said order has already been vacated in the court below upon consent.






SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

APPELLATE TERM : 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS


PRESENT : McCABE, P.J., RUDOLPH and ANGIOLILLO, JJ.


NO. 2004-1196 S C
C.F.C. COMMERCIAL FLOORING CONTRACTORS, INC.,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

-against-

GEORGE SACHS and BARBARA SACHS,

Defendants Third-Party Plaintiffs Appellants,

EURO MARBLE CENTER, INC.,

Third-Party-Defendant Respondent.

DECISION

Motion by respondent to dismiss the appeal for lack of prosecution denied, on condition that the appeal be perfected by December 3, 2004; otherwise, motion granted.