APPELLATE TERM : 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
| THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, -against- EDWIN J. COLLIGAN, Appellant. |
DECISION
Motion by the People as the respondent for an enlargement of time to file and serve a respondent's brief is denied as academic.
Defendant-appellant has yet to perfect the appeal.
APPELLATE TERM : 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
| THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, -against- RONALD ACKRIDGE, Appellant. |
DECISION
Motion by assigned counsel, Neal D. Futerfas, Esq., to be relieved of representing defendant-appellant on the appeal is granted and other counsel assigned pursuant to article 18-B of the County Law.
On the court's own motion, an enlargement of time to perfect appeal is granted and appeal shall be perfected by February 3, 2006; otherwise appeal dismissed.
APPELLATE TERM : 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
| THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, -against- ARTHUR W. FERDINAND, Appellant. |
DECISION
Motion by defendant-appellant for an enlargement of time to perfect appeal is granted and appeal shall be perfected by February 3, 2006; otherwise appeal dismissed.
APPELLATE TERM : 9th & 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
| THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, SONIA and MAX SILVERSTEIN HEBREW ACADEMY, INC., Appellant. |
DECISION
Motion by defendant-appellant seeking to stay payment of the fines totaling $22,700.00 pending determination of the appeal is granted on condition that the appeal is perfected by February 3, 2006; otherwise stay vacated.
APPELLATE TERM : 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
| THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, -against- JULIO BARRON, Appellant. |
DECISION
Motion by the People to dismiss the appeal is granted.
No appeal lies from an order arising out of a criminal proceeding absent specific statutory authorization (see CPL 450.10; People v Santos, 64 NY2d 702, 704 [1984]; People v Herrara, 171 AD2d 85, 87 [1991]).