SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

APPELLATE TERM : 2nd and 11th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS


PRESENT : PESCE, P.J., WESTON PATTERSON and GOLIA, JJ.


NO. 2005-59 K CR
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,

Respondent,


-against-

WILLIAM VAN ALST,

Appellant.

DECISION

On the court's own motion, the order of this court dated November 22, 2005 is amended so as to contain the additional provision that the matter is remitted to the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Kings County, pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5) for defendant to surrender himself to resume execution of his sentence.




SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

APPELLATE TERM : 2nd and 11th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS


PRESENT : PESCE, P.J., WESTON PATTERSON and GOLIA, JJ.


NO. 2005-426 Q CR
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,

Respondent,

-against-

SHAILESKUM PATEL,

Appellant.

DECISION

Motion by defendant-appellant seeking, in essence, to vacate dismissal of the appeal is granted on condition that the appeal is perfected by March 3, 2006; otherwise motion denied.






SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

APPELLATE TERM: 2nd and 11th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS


PRESENT : PESCE, P.J., GOLIA and BELEN, JJ.


NO. 2005-888 K CR
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,

Respondent,

-against-

MARK BELLI,

Appellant.

DECISION

Motion by defendant-appellant for an enlargement of time to perfect appeal is granted and appeal shall be perfected by March 3, 2006; otherwise appeal dismissed.






SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

APPELLATE TERM : 2nd and 11th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS


PRESENT: PESCE, P.J., GOLIA and BELEN, JJ.


NO. 2005-895 Q CR
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,

Respondent,

-against-


HARRY BRANCH,

Appellant.

DECISION

Motion by defendant-appellant for an enlargement of time to perfect appeal is granted and appeal shall be perfected by February 3, 2006; otherwise appeal dismissed.






SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

APPELLATE TERM : 2nd and 11th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS


PRESENT: PESCE, P.J., WESTON PATTERSON and GOLIA, JJ.


NO. 2005-1503 Q C
MICHAEL R. GORELICK
and ROBERT SLOTNICK,

Respondents,

-against-


NORMAL PORTNOW and INNOVATIVE
PLANNING CONCEPTS CORP.,

Appellants.

DECISION

Motion by appellants for stay of an order of the court below dated August 24, 2005 denied as moot and, upon the court's own motion, appeal is dismissed.

The parties have entered into a stipulation of settlement.