APPELLATE TERM, SUPREME COURT: FIRST DEPARTMENT
The following orders on motion were filed and entered on October 12, 2005

By: Suarez P.J., McCooe, Gangel-Jacob, J.J.
570691/05 T.S.Hotel vs Harper, J.
It is Ordered that the motion for a stay of enforcement of the judgment and warrant of eviction pending the determination of the appeal is granted on the condition that the appellant : 1- perfects her appeal by the February 2006 term of this court. The filing deadline is December 14, 2005; and 2- tenders accruing use and occupancy to the petitioner on each subsequent rental due date, without prejudice. See order.

570896/03 184 West 10th Corp vs Westcott, N. (#04-230)
Motion for leave to appeal to the Appellate Division - First Department is denied.

570350/04 Heller Information Services vs CIBC World Markets
Motion for reargument or for permission to appeal to the Appellate Division - First
Department is denied.

570896/03 184 West 10th Corp vs Westcott, N. (#04-048/049)
Motion for reargument or for permission to appeal to the Appellate Division - First Department is denied.

570294/05 Aimco Colombus Ave vs Bivou Restaurant (#05-308)
Order signed withdrawing the appeal with prejudice.

570735/05 NYCHA vs Willomon, T. - 5704(b) application declined.
570734/05 NYCHA vs Lawson, Eliza - 5704(b) application declined.

570259/04 People vs Delaney, J. (#04-325)
570451/04 People vs Aguilar, M. (#04-390)
570581/05 Santos, D. Vs Landroni, J. (#05-336/7)
Orders signed adjourning the appeals to the December 2005 term.

By:McCooe, J.P., Gangel-Jacob, Schoenfeld, J.J.
570458/05 30-40 Associates vs Cuervo, D.
It is Ordered that the motion is granted to the extent of enlarging the time to perfect the appeal to the February 2006 term of this court. No further extension of time will be granted. The cross-motion to vacate the stay and dismiss the appeal is denied, without prejudice to renew in the event the appellant fails to comply with the orders of this court.

570680/05 Regency Towers vs Nisanov, E.
It is Ordered that the motion seeking a stay of the legal fees hearing is granted on condition that appellant perfect the appeal for the January 2006 term of this court.
The cross-motion is denied without prejudice to asserting the issues raised therein in their respondent's answering brief on the appeal. See order.