People v Espinoza
2026 NY Slip Op 01740 [247 AD3d 617]
March 24, 2026
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, May 6, 2026
The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Manuel Espinoza, Appellant.
March 24, 2026
HEADNOTES
Crimes — Disclosure — Automatic Discovery — Form Prepared in Connection with Plea Agreement of Codefendant
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Law Office of Patrick Joyce, New York (Patrick J. Joyce of counsel), for appellant.
Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Jacob C. Marcus of counsel), for respondent.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (April A. Newbauer, J.), rendered February 15, 2024, as amended February 21, 2024, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree and conspiracy in the second degree, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of eight years, unanimously affirmed.
The automatic discovery provisions of CPL 245.20 (1) did not require the People to disclose a form prepared in connection with a codefendant's plea agreement, which stated that the codefendant intended to invoke his Fifth Amendment privilege if called to testify at trial, as the form did not "relate to the subject matter of the case" under the statute in effect at the time of the proceedings below (former CPL 245.20 [1], repealed by L 2025, ch 56, § 1, part LL, § 2 [eff Aug. 7, 2025]). Accordingly, the court properly rejected defendant's arguments that the People's belated disclosure of the form rendered their certificates of compliance and statements of readiness illusory, and that the indictment should be dismissed in accordance with CPL 30.30 (5) on that basis. Concur—Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Shulman, Rodriguez, Higgitt, Rosado, JJ.