Rivera v Cruz
2026 NY Slip Op 50723(U)
May 14, 2026
Appellate Term, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.
Mariela Rivera, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v
Joel Cruz; JCR Corp a/k/a JCR Services Group Corp., Defendants-Respondents.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Decided on May 14, 2026
570391/26
Present: James, P.J., Brigantti, Perez, JJ.
Plaintiff, as limited by her brief, appeals from so much of a judgment of the Small Claims Part of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Dana M. Catanzaro, J.), entered November 24, 2025, after trial, as limited her recovery of damages to the principal sum of $242.78.
[*1]Per Curiam.
Judgment (Dana M. Catanzaro, J.), entered November 24, 2025, affirmed, without costs.
The amount of the damage award issued in plaintiff's favor upon the trial of this small claims action achieved "substantial justice" (CCA 1804, 1807) and was neither inadequate nor unreasonable. There is no record support for any additional recovery, particularly in the absence of competent evidence establishing that a contract to install soundproof windows existed between the parties or that the other home improvement services rendered were defective or resulted in damage to plaintiff's property. Particularly in the context of small claims cases, the decision of the fact-finding court is entitled to deference where it rests in large measure on considerations relating to the credibility of witnesses (see Williams v Roper, 269 AD2d 125 [2000], lv dismissed 95 NY2d 898 [2000]).
We have considered plaintiff's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: May 14, 2026