Parris v Parris
2026 NY Slip Op 68010(U)
May 11, 2026
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports.
Gem Parris, et al., respondents,
v
Patricia Parris, defendants, 127-07 Sutter Ave. LLC, appellant.
Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division : Second Judicial Department
May 11, 2026
2025-09494, 537518/2023
Colleen D. Duffy, J.P.
Paul Wooten
Helen Voutsinas
James P. McCormack, JJ.
[*1]DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 7, 2025. Motion by 127-07 Sutter Ave. LLC to deem the notice of appeal to reflect that it is the appellant, to deem the informational statement to reflect that Gem Parris and Rawle Austin are the respondents, and, in effect, to extend the time to perfect the appeal. Cross-motion by Gem Parris and Rawle Austin, inter alia, to dismiss the appeal for failure to timely perfect.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and cross-motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to deem the notice of appeal to reflect that 127-07 Sutter Ave. LLC is the appellant is granted, the notice of appeal is deemed to reflect that 127-07 Sutter Ave. LLC is the appellant (see CPLR 2001; Matter of Tagliaferri, 1 NY3d 605), and the caption is amended accordingly; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to deem the informational statement to reflect that Gem Parris and Rawle Austin are the respondents is granted, the informational statement is deemed to reflect that Gem Parris and Rawle Austin are the respondents, and the caption is amended accordingly; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to extent the time to perfect the appeal is granted, and on or before June 10, 2026, the appellant shall serve and file the record or appendix and the appellant's brief via NYSCEF, if applicable, or, if NYSCEF is not mandated, serve the record or appendix and the appellant's brief and upload digital copies of the record or appendix and the appellant's brief, with proof of service thereof, through the digital portal on this Court's website; and it is further,
ORDERED that the cross-motion is denied.
DUFFY, J.P., WOOTEN, VOUTSINAS and MCCORMACK, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Darrell M. Joseph
Clerk of the Court